Salih Muhammed
All projects

Case study 04

Guided secure network design

Co-authored a study examining how lightweight guidance influenced participants' security and usability decisions when designing a simulated SME network.

10participants
79.4guided group average score
46.4unguided group average score

How the study ran

10 peopleSUTD studyGuidedwith guidanceUnguidedno guidanceSME networklayout, reasonsSME networklayout, reasons79.4avg score46.4avg score
Participants were split into guided and unguided groups. Each designed a simulated SME network with written justifications, scored under the same rubric.

Average security-design score

Scores under the study rubric. With ten participants in total, this is an observation from a small study, not a measured effect.
View data table
GroupAverage score
Guided79.4
Unguided46.4

01

Study design

Ten participants were divided between guided and unguided groups. The team assessed network layouts, design justifications and participant feedback.

02

Reported observations

The guided group achieved a higher average security-design score, 79.4 versus 46.4 under the study rubric. This is an observation from a small academic study, not a measured improvement in a production network.

03

Contribution

Team research and co-authorship of the resulting SUTD report.

All projects